Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
We’re aware of an issue affecting the address finder on some forms. This is linked to a problem with an external service, which may mean you’re unable to complete your report or application at the moment. We’re monitoring the situation closely and will provide updates as soon as possible. Please try again later. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Former PC Docherty attended a Misconduct Hearing which took place from 20-22nd April 2026 at the PSD Offices, Ivason House, London, where he answered allegations that his conduct amounted to breaches of the Standards of Professional Behaviour, in respect of:
It was alleged Former PC Docherty made a dishonest allegation of criminal conduct against Mr A.
There was a further allegation that Former PC Docherty engaged in a course of unwanted conduct against Mr A which had the effect of violating the dignity of or creating an intimidating, degrading, or humiliating environment for Mr A and demonstrated a failure to act with self-control and respect towards him, by:
(i) Subjecting him to unwanted conduct and/or;
(ii) Making him feel uncomfortable, and/or
(iii) Making him feel scared.
It was alleged that these matters individually and/or cumulatively amounted to gross misconduct, namely a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour that, if proved, were so serious as to justify dismissal.
The identity of victims/witnesses was protected during the hearing as appropriate.
The panel found all allegations proven and that former PC Docherty’s actions amounted to gross misconduct. The panel ruled that had he not already resigned, former PC Docherty would have been dismissed from the force with immediate effect.