Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
We’re aware of an issue affecting the address finder on some forms. This is linked to a problem with an external service, which may mean you’re unable to complete your report or application at the moment. We’re monitoring the situation closely and will provide updates as soon as possible. Please try again later. We apologise for any inconvenience.
PC Henry Regan attended an Accelarated Misconduct Hearing which took place on 27th April 2026 at Buckingham Palace Road, London.
PC Henry Regan, based in Luton, answered allegations that his conduct amounted to breaches of the Standards of Professional Behaviour, in respect of:
• Honesty and Integrity (Integrity Only)
• Orders and Instructions
• Confidentiality
• Discreditable Conduct
It was alleged that PC Regan, between 26 July 2024 and 3 March 2025, accessed Niche records and documents relating to an individual linked to a misconduct case against himself, without a legitimate policing purpose.
It was alleged that these matters amounted to gross misconduct, namely a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour that, if proved, were so serious as to justify dismissal.
The identity of victims/witnesses was protected during the hearing as appropriate.
The Chief Constable found that the standards of professional behaviour confidentiality proven but that it did not amount to gross misconduct, other standards of behaviour were not proven and that the case was dismissed.